1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
|
# Standard ML and Haskell
> Published at 2010-04-09T22:57:36+01:00
I am currently looking into the functional programming language Standard ML (aka SML). The purpose is to refresh my functional programming skills and to learn something new too. Since I already knew a little Haskell, I could not help myself, and I also implemented the same exercises in Haskell.
As you will see, SML and Haskell are very similar (at least when it comes to the basics). However, the syntax of Haskell is a bit more "advanced". Haskell utilizes fewer keywords (e.g. no val, end, fun, fn ...). Haskell also allows to write down the function types explicitly. What I have been missing in SML so far is the so-called pattern guards. Although this is a very superficial comparison for now, so far, I like Haskell more than SML. Nevertheless, I thought it would be fun to demonstrate a few simple functions of both languages to show off the similarities.
Haskell is also a "pure functional" programming language, whereas SML also makes explicit use of imperative concepts. I am by far not a specialist in either of these languages, but here are a few functions implemented in both SML and Haskell:
<< template::inline::toc
## Defining a multi-data type
Standard ML:
```sml
datatype ’a multi
= EMPTY
| ELEM of ’a
| UNION of ’a multi * ’a multi
```
Haskell:
```haskell
data (Eq a) => Multi a
= Empty
| Elem a
| Union (Multi a) (Multi a)
deriving Show
```
## Processing a multi
Standard ML:
```sml
fun number (EMPTY) _ = 0
| number (ELEM x) w = if x = w then 1 else 0
| number (UNION (x,y)) w = (number x w) + (number y w)
fun test_number w = number (UNION (EMPTY, \
UNION (ELEM 4, UNION (ELEM 6, \
UNION (UNION (ELEM 4, ELEM 4), EMPTY))))) w
```
Haskell:
```haskell
number Empty _ = 0
number (Elem x) w = if x == w then 1 else 0
test_number w = number (Union Empty \
(Union (Elem 4) (Union (Elem 6) \
(Union (Union (Elem 4) (Elem 4)) Empty)))) w
```
## Simplify function
Standard ML:
```sml
fun simplify (UNION (x,y)) =
let fun is_empty (EMPTY) = true | is_empty _ = false
val x’ = simplify x
val y’ = simplify y
in if (is_empty x’) andalso (is_empty y’)
then EMPTY
else if (is_empty x’)
then y’
else if (is_empty y’)
then x’
else UNION (x’, y’)
end
| simplify x = x
```
Haskell:
```haskell
simplify (Union x y)
| (isEmpty x’) && (isEmpty y’) = Empty
| isEmpty x’ = y’
| isEmpty y’ = x’
| otherwise = Union x’ y’
where
isEmpty Empty = True
isEmpty _ = False
x’ = simplify x
y’ = simplify y
simplify x = x
```
## Delete all
Standard ML:
```sml
fun delete_all m w =
let fun delete_all’ (ELEM x) = if x = w then EMPTY else ELEM x
| delete_all’ (UNION (x,y)) = UNION (delete_all’ x, delete_all’ y)
| delete_all’ x = x
in simplify (delete_all’ m)
end
```
Haskell:
```haskell
delete_all m w = simplify (delete_all’ m)
where
delete_all’ (Elem x) = if x == w then Empty else Elem x
delete_all’ (Union x y) = Union (delete_all’ x) (delete_all’ y)
delete_all’ x = x
```
## Delete one
Standard ML:
```sml
fun delete_one m w =
let fun delete_one’ (UNION (x,y)) =
let val (x’, deleted) = delete_one’ x
in if deleted
then (UNION (x’, y), deleted)
else let val (y’, deleted) = delete_one’ y
in (UNION (x, y’), deleted)
end
end
| delete_one’ (ELEM x) =
if x = w then (EMPTY, true) else (ELEM x, false)
| delete_one’ x = (x, false)
val (m’, _) = delete_one’ m
in simplify m’
end
```
Haskell:
```haskell
delete_one m w = do
let (m’, _) = delete_one’ m
simplify m’
where
delete_one’ (Union x y) =
let (x’, deleted) = delete_one’ x
in if deleted
then (Union x’ y, deleted)
else let (y’, deleted) = delete_one’ y
in (Union x y’, deleted)
delete_one’ (Elem x) =
if x == w then (Empty, True) else (Elem x, False)
delete_one’ x = (x, False)
```
## Higher-order functions
The first line is always the SML code, the second line the Haskell variant:
```
fun make_map_fn f1 = fn (x,y) => f1 x :: y
make_map_fn f1 = \x y -> f1 x : y
fun make_filter_fn f1 = fn (x,y) => if f1 x then x :: y else y
make_filter_fn f1 = \x y -> if f1 then x : y else y
fun my_map f l = foldr (make_map_fn f) [] l
my_map f l = foldr (make_map_fn f) [] l
fun my_filter f l = foldr (make_filter_fn f) [] l
my_filter f l = foldr (make_filter_fn f) [] l
```
E-Mail your comments to `paul@nospam.buetow.org` :-)
=> ../ Back to the main site
|
