From a2f3245832307601c43a3760953653deb482f816 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Buetow Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2026 17:45:51 +0200 Subject: Update content for html --- gemfeed/2023-01-23-why-grapheneos-rox.html | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'gemfeed/2023-01-23-why-grapheneos-rox.html') diff --git a/gemfeed/2023-01-23-why-grapheneos-rox.html b/gemfeed/2023-01-23-why-grapheneos-rox.html index 84ee68df..4b326b94 100644 --- a/gemfeed/2023-01-23-why-grapheneos-rox.html +++ b/gemfeed/2023-01-23-why-grapheneos-rox.html @@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ Art by Joan Stark Ubuntu Touch
More Linux distributions for mobile devices

-But here, Google Play would not be sandboxed; you could not configure individual network permissions and storage scopes like in GrapheneOS. Pure Linux-compatible phones usually come with a crappy camera, and the battery life is generally pretty bad (only a few hours). Also, no big tech company pushes the development of Linux phones. Everything relies on hobbyists, whereas multiple big tech companies put a lot of effort into the Android project, and a lot of code also goes into the Android Open-Source project.
+But here, Google Play would not be sandboxed; you could not configure individual network permissions and storage scopes like in GrapheneOS. Pure Linux-compatible phones usually come with a crappy camera, and the battery life is generally pretty bad (only a few hours). Also, no big tech company pushes the development of Linux phones. Everything relies on hobbyists, whereas multiple big tech companies put a lot of effort into the Android project, and a lot of code also goes into the Android Open-Source project.

Currently, pure Linux phones are only a nice toy to tinker with but are still not ready (will they ever?) to be the daily driver. SailfishOS may be an exception; I played around with it in the past. It is pretty usable, but it's not an option for me as it is partial a proprietary operating system.

-- cgit v1.2.3