summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/gemfeed/2021-04-24-welcome-to-the-geminispace.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'gemfeed/2021-04-24-welcome-to-the-geminispace.html')
-rw-r--r--gemfeed/2021-04-24-welcome-to-the-geminispace.html4
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/gemfeed/2021-04-24-welcome-to-the-geminispace.html b/gemfeed/2021-04-24-welcome-to-the-geminispace.html
index f02d45f1..d5b02788 100644
--- a/gemfeed/2021-04-24-welcome-to-the-geminispace.html
+++ b/gemfeed/2021-04-24-welcome-to-the-geminispace.html
@@ -95,8 +95,8 @@ p.quote:after {
<h2>Discovering the Gemini internet protocol</h2>
<p>Around the same time, I discovered a relatively new, more lightweight protocol named Gemini, which does not support all these CPU-intensive features like HTML, JavaScript, and CSS. Also, tracking and ads are unsupported by the Gemini protocol.</p>
<p>The "downside" is that due to the limited capabilities of the Gemini protocol, all sites look very old and spartan. But that is not a downside; that is, in fact, a design choice people made. It is up to the client software how your capsule looks. For example, you could use a graphical client, such as Lagrange, with nice font renderings and colours to improve the appearance. Or you could use a very minimalistic command line black-and-white Gemini client. It's your (the user's) choice.</p>
-<i>Screenshot Amfora Gemini terminal client surfing this site:</i><a href="./2021-04-24-welcome-to-the-geminispace/amfora-screenshot.png"><img alt="Screenshot Amfora Gemini terminal client surfing this site" title="Screenshot Amfora Gemini terminal client surfing this site" src="./2021-04-24-welcome-to-the-geminispace/amfora-screenshot.png" /></a><br />
-<i>Screenshot graphical Lagrange Gemini client surfing this site:</i><a href="./2021-04-24-welcome-to-the-geminispace/lagrange-screenshot.png"><img alt="Screenshot graphical Lagrange Gemini client surfing this site" title="Screenshot graphical Lagrange Gemini client surfing this site" src="./2021-04-24-welcome-to-the-geminispace/lagrange-screenshot.png" /></a><br />
+<a href="./2021-04-24-welcome-to-the-geminispace/amfora-screenshot.png"><img alt="Screenshot Amfora Gemini terminal client surfing this site" title="Screenshot Amfora Gemini terminal client surfing this site" src="./2021-04-24-welcome-to-the-geminispace/amfora-screenshot.png" /></a><br />
+<a href="./2021-04-24-welcome-to-the-geminispace/lagrange-screenshot.png"><img alt="Screenshot graphical Lagrange Gemini client surfing this site" title="Screenshot graphical Lagrange Gemini client surfing this site" src="./2021-04-24-welcome-to-the-geminispace/lagrange-screenshot.png" /></a><br />
<p>Why is there a need for a new protocol? As the modern web is a superset of Gemini, can't we use simple HTML 1.0 instead? That's a good and valid question. It is not a technical problem but a human problem. We tend to abuse the features once they are available. You can ensure that things stay efficient and straightforward as long as you are using the Gemini protocol. On the other hand, you can't force every website on the modern web to only create plain and straightforward-looking HTML pages.</p>
<h2>My own Gemini capsule</h2>
<p>As it is effortless to set up and maintain your own Gemini capsule (Gemini server + content composed via the Gemtext markup language), I decided to create my own. What I like about Gemini is that I can use my favourite text editor and get typing. I don't need to worry about the style and design of the presence, and I also don't have to test anything in ten different web browsers. I can only focus on the content! As a matter of fact, I am using the Vim editor + its spellchecker + auto word completion functionality to write this. </p>