summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/gemfeed/2010-04-09-standard-ml-and-haskell.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorPaul Buetow <paul@buetow.org>2021-11-30 21:58:45 +0000
committerPaul Buetow <paul@buetow.org>2021-11-30 21:58:45 +0000
commitff40caa62ab4430b81e9c8d38d77d3b64814185e (patch)
tree9d5a258e4bcf2a59fabaa1b7d37a7f628991249d /gemfeed/2010-04-09-standard-ml-and-haskell.html
parent3240a8b82b9395a9ec3ed9c1b07928bb5904dba9 (diff)
Publishing new version
Diffstat (limited to 'gemfeed/2010-04-09-standard-ml-and-haskell.html')
-rw-r--r--gemfeed/2010-04-09-standard-ml-and-haskell.html2
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/gemfeed/2010-04-09-standard-ml-and-haskell.html b/gemfeed/2010-04-09-standard-ml-and-haskell.html
index 21a527b2..89516771 100644
--- a/gemfeed/2010-04-09-standard-ml-and-haskell.html
+++ b/gemfeed/2010-04-09-standard-ml-and-haskell.html
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ p.quote:after {
</head>
<body>
<h1>Standard ML and Haskell</h1>
-<p class="quote"><i>Written by Paul Buetow 2010-04-09</i></p>
+<p class="quote"><i>Published by Paul Buetow 2010-04-09</i></p>
<p>I am currently looking into the functional programming language Standard ML (aka SML). The purpose is to refresh my functional programming skills and to learn something new too. Since I already knew a little Haskell, I could not help myself, and I also implemented the same exercises in Haskell.</p>
<p>As you will see, SML and Haskell are very similar (at least when it comes to the basics). However, the syntax of Haskell is a bit more "advanced". Haskell utilizes fewer keywords (e.g. no val, end, fun, fn ...). Haskell also allows to write down the function types explicitly. What I have been missing in SML so far is the so-called pattern guards. Although this is a very superficial comparison for now, so far, I like Haskell more than SML. Nevertheless, I thought it would be fun to demonstrate a few simple functions of both languages to show off the similarities. </p>
<p>Haskell is also a "pure functional" programming language, whereas SML also makes explicit use of imperative concepts. I am by far not a specialist in either of these languages, but here are a few functions implemented in both SML and Haskell:</p>