summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorPaul Buetow <paul@buetow.org>2022-11-26 08:52:23 +0200
committerPaul Buetow <paul@buetow.org>2022-11-26 08:52:23 +0200
commit5d7a486b9c52d8043856bf2882ccfe29ea2f0d69 (patch)
tree4ab9d9693a666ea4a4cbfa17dad4788e9c2e60b8
parent15718b18d34cabe31f21e19f0e8a9fe51c51bca4 (diff)
Update content for gemtext
-rw-r--r--gemfeed/atom.xml8
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/gemfeed/atom.xml b/gemfeed/atom.xml
index d2116c33..5ad29a66 100644
--- a/gemfeed/atom.xml
+++ b/gemfeed/atom.xml
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
- <updated>2022-11-26T08:41:31+02:00</updated>
+ <updated>2022-11-26T08:52:09+02:00</updated>
<title>foo.zone feed</title>
<subtitle>To be in the .zone!</subtitle>
<link href="gemini://foo.zone/gemfeed/atom.xml" rel="self" />
@@ -19,9 +19,9 @@
<content type="xhtml">
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
1c1
-< -rw-r--r--. 1 paul paul 14388 Nov 24 11:43 ../foo.zone-content/gemtext/gemfeed/2022-11-24-i-tried-emacs-but-i-switched-back-to-neovim.gmi
+< -rw-r--r--. 1 paul paul 14639 Nov 26 08:40 ../foo.zone-content/gemtext/gemfeed/2022-11-24-i-tried-emacs-but-i-switched-back-to-neovim.gmi
---
-> -rw-r--r--. 1 paul paul 14639 Nov 26 08:40 ../foo.zone-content/gemtext/gemfeed/2022-11-24-i-tried-emacs-but-i-switched-back-to-neovim.gmi
+> -rw-r--r--. 1 paul paul 14659 Nov 26 08:51 ../foo.zone-content/gemtext/gemfeed/2022-11-24-i-tried-emacs-but-i-switched-back-to-neovim.gmi
<h1>I tried (Doom) Emacs, but I switched back to (Neo)Vim</h1>
<p class="quote"><i>Published by Paul at 2022-11-24, last updated 2022-11-26</i></p>
<pre>
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ nmap ,i !wpbpaste&lt;CR&gt;
<p>I am not ready to dive deep into the whole world of Emacs. I prefer small and simple tools as opposed to complex tools. Emacs comes with many features out of the box, whereas in Vim/NeoVim, you would need to install many plugins to replicate some of the behaviour. Yes, I need to invest time managing all the Vim/NeoVim plugins I use, but I feel more in control compared to Doom Emacs, where a framework around vanilla Emacs manages all the plugins. I could use vanilla Emacs and manage all my plugins the vanilla way, but for me, it's not worth the effort to learn and dive into that as all that I want to do I can already do with Vim/NeoVim.</p>
<p>I am not saying that Vim/NeoVim are simple programs, but they are much simpler than Emacs with much smaller footprints; furthermore, they appear to be more straightforward as I am used to them. I only need Vim/NeoVim to be an editor, an IDE (through some plugins), and nothing more.</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
-<p>I understand the Emacs users now. Emacs is an incredibly powerful platform for almost everything, not just text editing. With Emacs, you can do nearly everything (Writing, editing, programming, calendar scheduling and note taking, Jira integration, playing games, reading/writing emails, browsing the web, using as a calculator, generating HTML pages, configuring interactive menus, jumping around between every feature and every file within one single session, chat on IRC, surf the Gopherspace, ... the options are endless....). If you want to have one piece of software which rules it all and you are happy to invest a large part of your time in your platform: Pick Emacs, and over time Emacs will become "your" Emacs, customized to your own needs and change the way it works, which makes the Emacs users stick even more to it.</p>
+<p>I understand the Emacs users now. Emacs is an incredibly powerful platform for almost everything, not just text editing. With Emacs, you can do nearly everything (Writing, editing, programming, calendar scheduling and note taking, Jira integration, playing games, listening to music, reading/writing emails, browsing the web, using as a calculator, generating HTML pages, configuring interactive menus, jumping around between every feature and every file within one single session, chat on IRC, surf the Gopherspace, ... the options are endless....). If you want to have one piece of software which rules it all and you are happy to invest a large part of your time in your platform: Pick Emacs, and over time Emacs will become "your" Emacs, customized to your own needs and change the way it works, which makes the Emacs users stick even more to it.</p>
<p>Vim/NeoVim also comes with a very high degree of customization options, but to a lesser extreme than Emacs (but still, a much higher degree than most other editors out there). If you want the best text editor in the world, which can also be tweaked to be a decent IDE, you are only looking for: Pick Vim or NeoVim! You would also need to invest a lot of time in learning, tweaking and customizing Vim/NeoVim, but that's a little more straightforward, and the result is much more lightweight once you get used to the "Vi way of doing things" you never would want to change back. I haven't tried the Emacs vanilla keystrokes, but they are terrible (that's probably one of the reasons why Doom Emacs uses Vim keybindings by default).</p>
<p class="quote"><i>Update: One reader recommended to have a look at NvChad. NvChad is a NeoVim config written in Lua aiming to provide a base configuration with very beautiful UI and blazing fast startuptime (around <span class="inlinecode">0.02</span> secs ~ <span class="inlinecode">0.07</span> secs). They tweak UI plugins such as telescope, nvim-tree, bufferline etc well to provide an aesthetic UI experience. That sounds interesting!</i></p>
<a class="textlink" href="https://github.com/NvChad/NvChad">https://github.com/NvChad/NvChad</a><br />